Cost of living |
|---|
Mandatory union membership and paymentsRepeal Wisconsin’s right-to-work protections
SB458: Bill Text • Bill History This bill would restore all-union agreements subject to Wisconsin Employment Relations Commission voting and referendum safeguards. | Christian Ellis Unspecified | Francesca HongEllis donated to in 2025 and 2026.Cosponsored: Francesca Hong, Mandatory union membership and payments; documented records | Joe SheehanEllis donated to in 2025.Cosponsored: Joe Sheehan, Mandatory union membership and payments; documented records | Tony EversEllis donated to in 2022. Unknown |
|---|
Banning tax increases through partial vetoesConstitutional amendment that would stop a governor from using partial vetoes to create or increase taxes or fees
| Christian Ellis Unspecified | Francesca HongEllis donated to in 2025 and 2026.Voted against: Francesca Hong, Banning tax increases through partial vetoes; documented recordsVoted no on SJR116 as amended in the Assembly on February 19, 2026. Roll-call vote | Joe SheehanEllis donated to in 2025.Voted against: Joe Sheehan, Banning tax increases through partial vetoes; documented recordsVoted no on SJR116 as amended in the Assembly on February 19, 2026. Roll-call vote | Tony EversEllis donated to in 2022. Unknown |
|---|
Sports and campus rights |
|---|
Keeping males out of female sports and locker roomsKeep biological males out of girls’ and women’s sports and locker rooms
AB100: Bill Text • Bill History This bill, as amended, would prohibit biological males from participating on school athletic teams or in sports designated for females, while retaining mixed-team rules. It would also designate multi-user school locker rooms, including shower rooms, for exclusive use by one biological sex, defined by the original birth certificate. It covers public schools, including charter schools, and private schools participating in parental-choice programs. Ordinary use of female-designated locker rooms would exclude biological males. Exceptions permit entry for custodial work, maintenance or inspection, medical assistance, specified employees performing their duties, children assisted by family or guardians, disability assistance, and emergencies or safety drills. Schools could temporarily redesignate rooms for the opposite sex during special events. Written requests trigger reasonable accommodations, such as single-occupancy or regulated staff locker-room use, and ADA accommodations remain permitted. AB102: Bill Text • Bill History This bill, as amended, would prohibit biological males from participating on UW and technical-college athletic teams or in sports designated for females or women, while retaining mixed-team rules. It would also designate multi-user UW and technical-college locker rooms, including shower rooms, for exclusive use by one biological sex, defined by the original birth certificate. Ordinary use of female-designated locker rooms would exclude biological males. Exceptions permit entry for custodial work, maintenance or inspection, medical assistance, specified employees performing their duties, children assisted by family or guardians, disability assistance, and emergencies or safety drills. Institutions could temporarily redesignate rooms for the opposite sex during special events. Written student requests trigger reasonable accommodations, such as single-occupancy or regulated staff locker-room use, and ADA accommodations remain permitted. These provisions do not extend to all private colleges. | Christian Ellis Unspecified | Francesca HongEllis donated to in 2025 and 2026.Voted against: Francesca Hong, Keeping males out of female sports and locker rooms; documented records | Joe SheehanEllis donated to in 2025.Voted against: Joe Sheehan, Keeping males out of female sports and locker rooms; documented records | Tony EversEllis donated to in 2022.Vetoed: Tony Evers, Keeping males out of female sports and locker rooms; documented records |
|---|
Campus free-speech and fair-hearing protectionsProtect academic freedom and require notice, access to evidence, counsel or an advocate, and impartial roles in disciplinary proceedings
SB498: Bill Text • Bill History This bill protects academic freedom and requires notice, access to evidence, counsel or an advocate, and impartial roles in disciplinary proceedings. More than one due-process violation within five years triggers a two-year tuition freeze; UW institutions also face a corresponding funding reduction. Biennial surveys assess First Amendment rights, academic freedom, bias and self-censorship. Annual instruction covers academic freedom, due process and First Amendment protections. | Christian Ellis Unspecified | Francesca HongEllis donated to in 2025 and 2026.Voted against: Francesca Hong, Campus free-speech and fair-hearing protections; documented records | Joe SheehanEllis donated to in 2025.Voted against: Joe Sheehan, Campus free-speech and fair-hearing protections; documented records | Tony EversEllis donated to in 2022.Vetoed: Tony Evers, Campus free-speech and fair-hearing protections; documented records |
|---|
Ending racial discrimination in college aidRace-neutral standards in college aid programs
SB652: Bill Text • Bill History This bill, as amended, uses individualized social and economic disadvantage, including financial information and a personal narrative, without considering race or sex. It also changes recruitment and retention priorities and removes specified medical- and dental-school minority-enrollment conditions. | Christian Ellis Unspecified | Francesca HongEllis donated to in 2025 and 2026.Voted against: Francesca Hong, Ending racial discrimination in college aid; documented recordsVoted no on SB652 as amended in the Assembly on February 12, 2026. Roll-call vote | Joe SheehanEllis donated to in 2025.Voted against: Joe Sheehan, Ending racial discrimination in college aid; documented recordsVoted no on SB652 as amended in the Assembly on February 12, 2026. Roll-call vote | Tony EversEllis donated to in 2022.Vetoed: Tony Evers, Ending racial discrimination in college aid; documented records |
|---|
Children and unborn life |
|---|
Allowing abortion even just before birthAllow abortion, at any stage, for any reason that the patient’s medical provider judges “necessary”
AB355 would allow abortion “at any time during the pregnancy if an abortion is necessary in the professional judgment of the individual’s medical provider.” It does not define “necessary” or list qualifying reasons, leaving it entirely to the provider’s discretion. AB355: Bill Text • Bill History This bill’s introduced section 11 allows abortion “at any time during the pregnancy if an abortion is necessary in the professional judgment of the individual’s medical provider.” It does not define “necessary” or enumerate qualifying reasons or limit necessity to saving the mother’s life. | Christian Ellis Unspecified | Francesca HongEllis donated to in 2025 and 2026.Coauthored: Francesca Hong, Allowing abortion even just before birth; documented records | Joe SheehanEllis donated to in 2025.Coauthored: Joe Sheehan, Allowing abortion even just before birth; documented records | Tony EversEllis donated to in 2022. Unknown |
|---|
Taxpayer-funded abortion for public employeesRequiring abortion coverage in government employee plans that cover maternity care
AB355: Bill Text • Bill History This bill’s introduced sections 1–5 remove existing coverage restrictions and require abortion and related medical-service coverage in state and Group Insurance Board plans if they cover maternity care. Section 20 separately repeals the prohibition on abortion coverage in exchange plans; it permits that coverage rather than requiring it. The bill retains the separate conscience provision in section 253.09. | Christian Ellis Unspecified | Francesca HongEllis donated to in 2025 and 2026.Coauthored: Francesca Hong, Taxpayer-funded abortion for public employees; documented records | Joe SheehanEllis donated to in 2025.Coauthored: Joe Sheehan, Taxpayer-funded abortion for public employees; documented records | Tony EversEllis donated to in 2022. Unknown |
|---|
Protecting kids from irreversible sex-change surgeriesRestrictions on surgeries, puberty blockers, and cross-sex hormones for minors
AB104: Bill Text • Bill History This bill covers specified surgeries, puberty blockers, cross-sex hormones and referrals for people under 18. Exceptions cover specified sex-development-disorder treatment, treatment of complications, and procedures necessary to avert imminent death or impairment of a major bodily function. Professional-license enforcement and a six-month tapering transition apply. | Christian Ellis Unspecified | Francesca HongEllis donated to in 2025 and 2026.Voted against: Francesca Hong, Protecting kids from irreversible sex-change surgeries; documented records | Joe SheehanEllis donated to in 2025.Voted against: Joe Sheehan, Protecting kids from irreversible sex-change surgeries; documented records | Tony EversEllis donated to in 2022.Vetoed: Tony Evers, Protecting kids from irreversible sex-change surgeries; documented records |
|---|
Schools |
|---|
Federal scholarship tax credits for WisconsinRequiring Wisconsin to participate in the federal scholarship tax-credit program
AB602: Bill Text • Bill History This bill would require the governor to elect participation in the federal scholarship tax-credit program, which begins in 2027, and provide for scholarship-organization lists and certification. | Christian Ellis Unspecified | Francesca HongEllis donated to in 2025 and 2026.Voted against: Francesca Hong, Federal scholarship tax credits for Wisconsin; documented records | Joe SheehanEllis donated to in 2025.Voted against: Joe Sheehan, Federal scholarship tax credits for Wisconsin; documented records | Tony EversEllis donated to in 2022.Vetoed: Tony Evers, Federal scholarship tax credits for Wisconsin; documented records |
|---|
Timely access to classroom materialsRequire schools to allow no-cost inspection of covered classroom materials within 14 days and an online list of adopted textbooks
A 2021 report by the Wisconsin Institute for Law & Liberty concluded that political agendas are pervasive in Wisconsin classrooms and that parental inspection of teaching materials is difficult, costly, and subject to months-long delays. Examples in the report included no response from Sheboygan after three months and an estimated $5,250 charge from Madison for records from seven teachers. AB5: Bill Text • Bill History This bill preserves copyright protections and existing public-records rights. The Senate rejected Senate Amendment 1; no substantive amendment was adopted. | Christian Ellis Unspecified | Francesca HongEllis donated to in 2025 and 2026.Voted against: Francesca Hong, Timely access to classroom materials; documented records | Joe SheehanEllis donated to in 2025.Voted against: Joe Sheehan, Timely access to classroom materials; documented records | Tony EversEllis donated to in 2022.Vetoed: Tony Evers, Timely access to classroom materials; documented records |
|---|
Restoring nationally aligned school-testing standardsRealign Wisconsin standardized test scoring with the National Assessment of Educational Progress
AB1: Bill Text • Bill History This bill uses 2019–20 report-card thresholds and descriptions, NAEP-aligned Forward English and math classifications, and 2021–22 PreACT/ACT classifications. | Christian Ellis Unspecified | Francesca HongEllis donated to in 2025 and 2026.Voted against: Francesca Hong, Restoring nationally aligned school-testing standards; documented records | Joe SheehanEllis donated to in 2025.Voted against: Joe Sheehan, Restoring nationally aligned school-testing standards; documented records | Tony EversEllis donated to in 2022.Vetoed: Tony Evers, Restoring nationally aligned school-testing standards; documented records |
|---|
Parental consent for student name and pronoun changes at schoolRequire parental authorization before changing records for student names or pronouns
AB103: Bill Text • Bill History • Adopted amendment This bill, as amended by Assembly Amendment 1, requires written, notarized parental or guardian authorization for covered minor-pupil record changes and staff use of names or pronouns not aligned with biological sex. Pupils 18 or older submit their own notarized requests; specified shortened names are excepted. | Christian Ellis Unspecified | Francesca HongEllis donated to in 2025 and 2026.Voted against: Francesca Hong, Parental consent for student name and pronoun changes at school; documented records | Joe SheehanEllis donated to in 2025.Voted against: Joe Sheehan, Parental consent for student name and pronoun changes at school; documented records | Tony EversEllis donated to in 2022.Vetoed: Tony Evers, Parental consent for student name and pronoun changes at school; documented records |
|---|